Tag: 上海上门24小时

How I think this low-debt, dividend-growing stock could surge after Brexit

first_img Kevin Godbold | Monday, 20th January, 2020 | More on: BOOT Our 6 ‘Best Buys Now’ Shares How I think this low-debt, dividend-growing stock could surge after Brexit During the 20th century, Henry Boot (LSE: BOOT) was a vast enterprise with building, construction, civil engineering and other related businesses within its portfolio.A series of disposals and a rationalisation agenda over the past few decades have transformed the company into a land management, property development and construction company today – a smaller, leaner and more focused operation with the potential to keep on growing.5G is here – and shares of this ‘sleeping giant’ could be a great way for you to potentially profit!According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US$12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…And if you click here we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential…Good strategic progressOne of the things I like about Henry Boot is its record of dividends. The payment has gone up a bit every year since at least 2013. Another attractive feature is the modest level of debt on the balance sheet.I’m less keen about the inherent cyclicality in the business. Revenue, earnings and cash flow demonstrated their volatility during 2018. And the share price sank by around 32% between its peak in January 2018 and August 2019. However, since then it’s bounced back up and now trades within a whisker of its previous high. Perhaps the easing of Brexit uncertainty had a bit to do with that.In today’s update for the full 2019 trading year, the directors revealed to us that the company made “good”strategic progress in the period “against an uncertain political and economic background.” But I’m nervous about the short-term prospects for the company, and the directors’ comments didn’t reassure me. They said in the report: “As a long-term business, Henry Boot is well-positioned.” Meanwhile, the overall performance of the business in 2019 was “marginally lower” than the board’s original expectations. That was driven by the disposal of “the majority” of the firm’s retail investments, which reduced rental income. I reckon that’s a good thing, and I’m pleased to see the firm still nipping and tucking its operations for optimal trading.The sales have endowed the company with higher-than-expected net cash of around £30m, which compares to a net debt position of £18m a year earlier. That dry powder means the company is well-positioned to take advantage of “several” opportunities for reinvestment that the directors have identified for 2020.Is the construction division a weakness? The construction arm of the business has negative potential, in my view. For perspective, during 2018 around 18% of overall operating profit came from construction activities, but the division accounted for about 25% of total revenue. We’ve seen several investing disasters over the years from listed construction companies, and the turnover in that area of operations could cause a headache if it starts generating losses.But the directors said in the narrative that construction held up well in 2019 “especially given the much-publicised challenges facing the construction market.” There’s a strong order book in the division for 2020.The overall outlook is positive, but I can’t help thinking that the share price could swing lower before it goes meaningfully higher, and I’d be more inclined to buy such dips than I am to pick up the shares now. With the share price at 327p, the forward-looking earnings multiple is just under 11 for 2020 and the anticipated dividend yield around 3.4%. I’d aim to buy when the valuation looks lower. Simply click below to discover how you can take advantage of this. Kevin Godbold has no position in any share mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Enter Your Email Address I’m sure you’ll agree that’s quite the statement from Motley Fool Co-Founder Tom Gardner.But since our US analyst team first recommended shares in this unique tech stock back in 2016, the value has soared.What’s more, we firmly believe there’s still plenty of upside in its future. In fact, even throughout the current coronavirus crisis, its performance has been beating Wall St expectations.And right now, we’re giving you a chance to discover exactly what has got our analysts all fired up about this niche industry phenomenon, in our FREE special report, A Top US Share From The Motley Fool.center_img “This Stock Could Be Like Buying Amazon in 1997” Renowned stock-picker Mark Rogers and his analyst team at The Motley Fool UK have named 6 shares that they believe UK investors should consider buying NOW.So if you’re looking for more stock ideas to try and best position your portfolio today, then it might be a good day for you. Because we’re offering a full 33% off your first year of membership to our flagship share-tipping service, backed by our ‘no quibbles’ 30-day subscription fee refund guarantee. I would like to receive emails from you about product information and offers from The Fool and its business partners. Each of these emails will provide a link to unsubscribe from future emails. More information about how The Fool collects, stores, and handles personal data is available in its Privacy Statement. Click here to claim your copy now — and we’ll tell you the name of this Top US Share… free of charge! Image source: Getty Images. See all posts by Kevin Godboldlast_img read more

read more

Committee will propose comprehensive revision of the Book of Common…

first_img Rector Albany, NY James Graham says: Assistant/Associate Rector Washington, DC Eugene Search says: Associate Priest for Pastoral Care New York, NY General Convention, Todd Lane says: James M. Knox says: Joe Thoma says: July 6, 2018 at 1:42 pm This is about far more than semantics, or a petty quibbling over “pronouns”. Language is important. Words represent ideas, and in this context, spiritual realities. There is a reason Christ himself is referred to as The Word. You muck around with the language, and you distort, even destroy, the essence of teaching and people’s understanding of religion. Ultimately, you destroy Faith, because you undermine its foundation of belief. And why? Because a few empowered but very misguided delegates are drunk with power, and a sense of their own importance and personal spiritual “revelations” to set against two millennia of Spiritually inspired tradition. Satan is rubbing his hands with glee! Matt Ouellette says: Comments are closed. July 5, 2018 at 7:01 pm As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, this is not a good idea. We don’t need this kind of divisive process going on right now after we have begun to move on from the gay marriage debate. We need to engage more with our current prayer book as we recover from the aftermath of our previously divisive issue. Also, I oppose any changes to the Lord’s Prayer. We shouldn’t try fundamentally changing the words of Jesus. Our current English translations accurately convey the original meaning of His prayer. July 7, 2018 at 11:06 pm Take a look at the Unitarians and Universalists did in the 1960’s when they pushed through all their reforms. They went from being liberal Christian denominations to post-Christian and lost half their members. Many people point to the Unitarians as being the canary in the coal mine for liberal Protestants in the USA. I fear the Episcopal Church is lining up to be UU’s with a better wardrobe. July 5, 2018 at 7:39 pm Amen Matt! Enough novelty, innovation and divisiveness. Give it a rest. If the Lord’s Prayer is messed with that will cook it with many who would otherwise tolerate other novel rites that they don’t have to experience each Sunday. Director of Music Morristown, NJ Hugh Hansen,, P. says: The Rev. Tyler Richards says: July 8, 2018 at 7:18 pm This entire conversation strikes home to me. As the parish coordinator for a very small church that hasn’t been able to afford a priest for more than 3 years , I was recently, ( well, last lent) confronted with the modernist language issue in a big way. A member of our vestry asked to lead a “Bible” study on the Gospel of Mark and I gave him permission to do so. In the first lesson he presented material stating that the Jesus of Mark’s Gospel is a fiction, and should be regarded with the same sense of fun that we approach Harry Potter by JK Rowling. He went on to say that belief in a literal resurrection was akin to belief in the tooth fairy. Thankfully our wonderful Sr. Warden told him in no uncertain terms that he could NOT teach that “theory ” in our church. I am frightened about this “new” language and ideology. Matt Ouellette says: Rector Tampa, FL Episcopal Charities of the Diocese of New York Hires Reverend Kevin W. VanHook, II as Executive Director Episcopal Charities of the Diocese of New York Press Release Service TryTank Experimental Lab and York St. John University of England Launch Survey to Study the Impact of Covid-19 on the Episcopal Church TryTank Experimental Lab July 6, 2018 at 2:04 pm Couldn’t agree more James! July 8, 2018 at 4:30 pm Don’t have to look far, do we? In-person Retreat: Thanksgiving Trinity Retreat Center (West Cornwall, CT) Nov. 24-28 AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to PrintFriendlyPrintFriendlyShare to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to EmailEmailShare to MoreAddThis July 6, 2018 at 12:14 am Thank you, Matt. It’s nice to know that others (most others) aren’t in agreement with the HoD. Matt Ouellette says: Bishop Diocesan Springfield, IL Rector Shreveport, LA July 5, 2018 at 11:10 pm Amen! July 6, 2018 at 12:31 pm Amen Matt Ouellette says: Grace Buchanan says: July 5, 2018 at 11:52 pm As we have not lived into the Baptismal Theology of the current Book of Common Prayer, to move forward with revising the book seems ill-timed and ill-advised. While I am sympathetic to those who long for gender neutral language, an idea that I am not opposed to, those concerns can be addressed by creating supplements for the Prayer Book as it stands without rewriting it. There is more to revising a prayer book than just “giving the people what they want.” Changing a prayer book changes the DNA of our worship and I for one do not think we are ready for such a thing. This Summer’s Anti-Racism Training Online Course (Diocese of New Jersey) June 18-July 16 Mike Grigsby-Lane says: Cathedral Dean Boise, ID July 5, 2018 at 9:31 pm To be clear, I’m not against the use of more gender-neutral and feminine imagery for God. As God transcends gender, it’s no more wrong to use female images to describe God than male ones. However, I am against theologically fuzzy expressions which sometimes are heretical (e.g. using the modalist Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier form as an alternative name for the Trinity). We need to make sure we’ve thought through the images we use before we start making revisions, or we could end up losing essential doctrines implicit in our prayers. Spending more time with the 1979 BCP would be the best way to go right now, I think. Episcopal Migration Ministries’ Virtual Prayer Vigil for World Refugee Day Facebook Live Prayer Vigil June 20 @ 7 p.m. ET July 6, 2018 at 11:29 am Who will rid us of these meddlesome, tone-deaf Baby Boomers? July 5, 2018 at 10:05 pm Start with this simple data. Find out how many Episcopalians flat out ignore the contemporary version of the Lord’s Prayer in the 1979 BCP, and opt instead to maintain the traditional version. That should give the flavor for how well-received “expanded” prayer tinkering has been since 1979. Rector Bath, NC July 6, 2018 at 9:55 pm This is very troubling. We have lost 1/3 of our membership since the last prayer book revision. Attendance is down and continuing to fall. We need to be focused on the current liturgy and trying to broaden our appeal. I don’t think this is the way to do it. Rev. Dr. James Hargis says: July 5, 2018 at 10:37 pm I would rather see an American version of the Church of England’s Common Worship be adopted as a replacement for the 1979 BCP. July 5, 2018 at 10:45 pm I don’t think quotas for representation are an answer here, but unless there are others not shown: 10 guys, 4 women (I think), 2 members might be under the age of 40 or 45; all seem to be white. Haven’t we had a conversation or two about such matters…I’m at a loss. Charles Jordan says: Jim Shoemaker says: Stephen Nesbitt says: July 6, 2018 at 7:45 am It will be like New Coke! What could go wrong? Doug Desper says: July 8, 2018 at 7:03 pm Amen! Comments navigation Newer comments Grant Barber says: July 6, 2018 at 7:12 pm I agree..Also Didn’t Jesus say “Father” when he prayed? Yes he did! So leave the Lords Prayer alone. Stop trying to modernize God and tell him what he should believe. Anymore changes especially this one and I will leave the church as well. Priest-in-Charge Lebanon, OH John Hobart says: Rector Smithfield, NC Director of Administration & Finance Atlanta, GA July 6, 2018 at 5:16 am Round 2 of churches leaving and here come once again lawsuits eating millions of $$$$$$$.Now is not the time to due a rewrite of the Prayer Book. At a time the Church is healing from all the brake away congregations, another body blow and the Church will most likely down for the count. By Melodie WoermanPosted Jul 5, 2018 Steve Price says: July 6, 2018 at 4:09 pm Heather, many don’t have a problem with limited expansive language. It has a place and I’m for it until something ridiculous like “Baker woman God” gets a serious place. It’s only a huge barrier when the direct imagery used by Jesus in the Lord’s Prayer becomes supplanted by whatever images modern revisionists believe touches their soul better. How about, instead, learning about the imagery as used by Jesus (Father/Son relation) and cease creating a boutique church that seeks to satisfy egos and whims.Like some others I wonder how sufficient the oxygen level is at General Convention. Ideas cooked up on List Serve, in Committee Rooms, and among 1,000 people are not sounding solid nor are draconian ideas squaring with the reality of a Church whose downward spiral can no longer be hidden – but ignored, yes. We should remember that no one ever erected a statue to a committee or a convention, and at times like this we find out why. July 6, 2018 at 12:15 am It’s too bad that there wasn’t social media when they were at the same stage of planning the 1979 prayer book. I’m wondering if the commentary would be same as we have here. I like the current prayer book, and I also like some of the alternative liturgies and prayer books from throughout the Anglican Communion that have been used at various worship services. This sounds like it’s going to be a long and drawn-out process (with a 2030 proposed release date). My guess is that the faces on the committee with change as the years go by as well. As this is TEC, there are bound to be lots of opportunities to provide feedback along the way. I’m reserving judgement until they actually come out with something for us to have an opinion about July 6, 2018 at 9:24 pm Unnecessary, a total waste of time and resources. Seek deeper engagement with the current BCP. Kathleen A Munroe says: Assistant/Associate Priest Scottsdale, AZ Tags Members of the Committee to Receive the Report of Resolution A169, which is considering revision of the Book of Common Prayer, clap along while singing a hymn before the start of their morning meeting on July 5. Photo: Melodie Woerman/Episcopal News Service[Episcopal News Service – Austin, Texas] The Committee to Receive the Report of Resolution A169, which is considering resolutions to revise of the Book of Common Prayer, voted on July 5 to propose to General Convention a plan for comprehensive revision of the current 1979 prayer book. The resolution, which will be an amendment to Resolution A068, authorizes the start of a revision process that could culminate in a new prayer book in 2030.The resolution was developed by a subcommittee appointed on July 4 to incorporate the process of revision specified in Resolution A068, as well as calls for inclusive and expansive language for God and human beings, which were presented during hearings, also on July 4.Full ENS coverage of the 79th meeting of General Convention is available here.The proposal calls for the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music to begin the revision process using the 1979 prayer book as the starting point and to utilize “inclusive and expansive language and imagery for humanity and divinity” in making changes. It also will “incorporate and express understanding, appreciation and care for God’s creation.”Exempted from the inclusive language revision will be Holy Eucharist Rite 1 and the church’s historical documents printed in the prayer book. In a split between the deputies and bishops who meet together but vote separately, exempting the Lord’s Prayer from revision was adopted by the bishops but rejected by the deputies.That means that the deputies’ version will be presented to the House of Deputies when the matter is taken up in a special order of business on July 6 at 4 p.m. If adopted there with that clause intact, the bishops’ version will be debated in the House of Bishops. Reconciliation then would be needed between the two versions.This resolution carries through the background materials associated with the original A068, which describe a 12-year process of prayer book revision. This includes a comprehensive survey of the liturgies in use in congregations, consultation with other provinces of the Anglican Communion, drafting committees and an overall editor. The plan is to gather data over the next three years, with a complete revision by 2024.That proposed book would undergo three years of trial use throughout the Episcopal Church, with a first vote by General Convention in 2027. Because revision of the prayer book is part of the church’s Constitution, adoption of a new book requires votes in two consecutive General Conventions to take effect, placing final approval on the agenda in 2030.– Melodie Woerman is director of communications for the Diocese of Kansas and is a member of the ENS General Convention reporting team. Doug Desper says: July 6, 2018 at 2:24 pm Dear Friends– as a cradle Episcopalian from generations of Episcopalians, I wince when I hear God the Almighty Creator reduced to one human gender– “Father”. I feel the same about “Mother.” Such terminology creates a confusion between God and human males which is unhelpful to all, and has contributed to patriarchal horrors. Those who want to gender everything don’t recognize the feminine aspects of Sophia/the Holy Spirit, giving further evidence of one-sided sexism. We humans need to hold onto our Anglican via media tradition which has grown and continues to grow usually for the better- remember the dire predictions if we adopted the 1979 BCP? Or having women be ordained priests???? We’ve grown in that ministry, thank God. We can grown in not reducing God to one aspect of the Almighty. Years ago when I was struggling with this reduction a theologian said to me, well, if God were solely male, what are you doing here? We both laughed happily. I expect that God the Almighty & Loving Creator has dimensions we humans cannot imagine. We should be loving ourselves– to all God’s children. Being expansive and inclusive is central to Jesus’ ministry. Thank you. Submit an Event Listing July 6, 2018 at 7:54 am I am quite sure that it won’t! Scripture is clear that God adds to the church-not our gimmicks! I believe that people leave the church because we look more and more like the world around us. We want so much to fit in with what we think the world wants that we no longer look like Christ! July 6, 2018 at 11:51 am Sounds like another fallacious example of TEC’s futility at trying to be so culturally with it (relevant), that it loses the liturgical beauty that has stood the test of the times. Some revision is always appropriate, but without sacrificing the profound theological majesty. If we try to be all things to all people, the church loses. We must stand for something, lest we fall for everything. Christ stood for something good, inspirational, and salvific! TEC must, too. July 6, 2018 at 4:57 am 2030 you say. If I make it to the age of 82 in 12 years. By then I will turn down the volume of my hearing aids with the hope of never hearing a word from the proposed new Prayer Book. Prayer Book Revision Comments navigation Newer comments David Stevens says: center_img Lloyd Newell says: July 6, 2018 at 1:42 pm So glad the House of Bishops took a stand with regard to tampering with the “gender identity” of God the Father in the Lord’s Prayer. I hope they will have the guts to stand up to this misguided force for ultimate annihilation of Christian theology in TEC. One has to wonder–what gets poured into the “punchbowl” at these Conventions? I suspect they are giddy with “power”, and have the vanity to suppose they can trash 2000 years of spiritually inspired tradition based on their personal “revelations”? I think it’s really an issue of egos. Or do these misguided folks check their common sense, and conscience, with Satan, at the door when they enter? Oops–I forgot! It’s de rigueur among those folks not to believe in the Devil anymore. Featured Events July 6, 2018 at 6:23 pm Have you given any thought to the fact that maybe your church doesn’t have more then 50 on a Sunday because your church refuses to change? I go to the fastest growing episcopal church in my diocese and I can tell you that spirit led change leads to growth. We have to be willing to die to self to experience resurrection. I believe I’ve read that somewhere. Curate (Associate & Priest-in-Charge) Traverse City, MI July 6, 2018 at 1:17 pm Although I would like to see more gender neutral language used in some ares, such as replacing “men” with “people”, and using the word God in place of His or Him where applicable, I too, do not think we have plumbed the depths of the 1979 prayer book to the point where we should make major changes. It is a wonderful resource for prayer and information, and I think that making it too neutral and ‘social mores’ friendly will result in a loss of our identity as Episcopalians. That said, I do love the contemporary version of the Lord’s prayer. It feels to me like I am having a conversation with God when I say it with feeling. Virtual Celebration of the Jerusalem Princess Basma Center Zoom Conversation June 19 @ 12 p.m. ET Family Ministry Coordinator Baton Rouge, LA Doug Desper says: July 6, 2018 at 8:02 pm The biggest problem with prayer book revision right now is that it is a divisive process, and we still need to deal with the aftermath of the divisive marriage equality debate. We should sort that out first before taking on another divisive issue. I also think some of the concern here with prayer book revision is a lack of trust in some of the leadership who will be in charge of prayer book revision. There are some in leadership who want to take the prayer book in an extremely theologically liberal direction (e.g. remove or radically rewrite the Nicene Creed, rewrite the Lord’s Prayer, etc.) rather than simply express the orthodox faith in a more gender-inclusive manner. Therefore, I suspect many here would rather wait the revise the prayer book until there is newer leadership that will be more theologically careful with their revisions. Jason VanBorssum says: Cheryl Dornbush says: Priest Associate or Director of Adult Ministries Greenville, SC Matt Ouellette says: Todd Lane says: Rector Washington, DC Liturgy & Music, Ya no son extranjeros: Un diálogo acerca de inmigración Una conversación de Zoom June 22 @ 7 p.m. ET July 5, 2018 at 11:37 pm Picture of receiving committee engaging in ” happy,clappy” hymn singing is not an encouraging sight for those of us interested in the preservation of our traditional liturgy.Is it true then that the proposal is to replace “the Blessed Virgin Mary ” with” our sister Mary “and the “Holy Catholic Church “with the ” body of Christ”? Wouldn’t it just be easier to close our red doors and join the Baptist Church? James Graham says: Mark Bigley says: July 6, 2018 at 8:01 am Grant: in a church that barely musters a half-million attendance on Sundays every voice should count. I’m not sure what planet some of these movers for changing the Prayer Book live on, but in the real world we can’t afford to keep alienating what’s left of this Church. Supplemental rites? Yes. New Prayer Book with draconian changes in theology to satisfy theological revisionists? Why go there? Committee rooms and convention floors are not the best pulse for the wider Church. General Convention is a big playground of thought, innovation, and impulse. That doesn’t equally square with reality when most of our churches don’t have more than 50 on Sundays with half without regular clergy. Time to come down to earth. The Church Investment Group Commends the Taskforce on the Theology of Money on its report, The Theology of Money and Investing as Doing Theology Church Investment Group July 5, 2018 at 10:47 pm A change to the Lord’s Prayer that goes beyond being a translation from the Greek to being something new or innovative runs the risk of putting the Episcopal Church outside the mainstream norm of historic Christianity. Also, what about other historic prayers? The Creeds? James Graham says: Grace Buchanan says: Committee will propose comprehensive revision of the Book of Common Prayer Join the Episcopal Diocese of Texas in Celebrating the Pauli Murray Feast Online Worship Service June 27 Rector Belleville, IL July 6, 2018 at 11:12 am Would the last person out of the Episcopal Church please extinguish the sanctury lamp? Inaugural Diocesan Feast Day Celebrating Juneteenth San Francisco, CA (and livestream) June 19 @ 2 p.m. PT Heather Huyck says: General Convention 2018, New Berrigan Book With Episcopal Roots Cascade Books Submit a Press Release Neal Campbell says: An Evening with Presiding Bishop Curry and Iconographer Kelly Latimore Episcopal Migration Ministries via Zoom June 23 @ 6 p.m. ET July 7, 2018 at 9:27 am I agree with you, but the Commission appears to have an agenda. Whether or not us, the congregants, agree is not their concern. Change the Lord’s Prayer? I’m happy the bishops don’t support this.I also notice the commission a massive lack of generational diversity on the Commission. Where are the young people (sans ine or two)? Why are they, the fiture of the church not fully included? Is it because they overwhelmingly prefer traditional or contemplative prayer? Curate Diocese of Nebraska Associate Rector Columbus, GA Rector (FT or PT) Indian River, MI Seminary of the Southwest announces appointment of two new full time faculty members Seminary of the Southwest July 5, 2018 at 8:16 pm I’m sure this will turn around the sharp decline in membership! Remember Holy Land Christians on Jerusalem Sunday, June 20 American Friends of the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem Rector Martinsville, VA July 5, 2018 at 9:14 pm Revision of the BCP, especially to incorporate “gender neutral” reference to God the Father would be a pernicious and perhaps fatal blow to what is left of our church. Will these folks never stop? I don’t think so–unless we stand up to them. I, for one, will leave immediately, and find another church home–one that isn’t hell-bent on theological revisionism and heresy. I don’t think I am alone in my position. Rector/Priest in Charge (PT) Lisbon, ME July 6, 2018 at 8:35 am Good point, Rev. Tyler. The current status quo allows parishes to experiment with the use of more gender-neutral and feminine images of God in our liturgies, so there’s no real urgency to revise the Prayer Book right now on that basis. Also, the current Prayer Book, via Rite III, has rubrics in place to allow priests to experiment with gender-inclusive language. We just don’t need to start making these revisions to our prayer book at this time. Rector and Chaplain Eugene, OR Course Director Jerusalem, Israel The Church Pension Fund Invests $20 Million in Impact Investment Fund Designed to Preserve Workforce Housing Communities Nationwide Church Pension Group Rector Collierville, TN July 5, 2018 at 10:28 pm You are not alone! Rev. Dr. James Hargis says: Rector Hopkinsville, KY Eugene Search says: Richard Lammlin says: Comments (47) Eugene Search says: July 5, 2018 at 7:55 pm Good, succinct story — Thanks, Melodie! July 5, 2018 at 10:27 pm I concur! Lloyd Newell says: Associate Rector for Family Ministries Anchorage, AK July 6, 2018 at 8:37 am I agree, Lloyd, which is exactly why I think now is the wrong time to begin such a divisive process. Rector Knoxville, TN July 6, 2018 at 11:52 am Sounds like another fallacious example of TEC’s futility at trying to be so culturally with it, that it loses the liturgical beauty that has stood the test of the times. Some revision is always appropriate, but without sacrificing the profound theological majesty. If we try to be all things to all people, the church loses. We must stand for something, lest we fall for everything. Christ stood for something good, inspirational, and salvific! TEC must, too. Doug Desper says: Marion Johnson says: Canon for Family Ministry Jackson, MS Vicki Kelsey says: Submit a Job Listing Youth Minister Lorton, VA Rector Pittsburgh, PA July 7, 2018 at 7:57 pm So the Historical Documentments are no longer important enough to be in the BCP? I wonder why? No (good) reason was given. Niebuhr was right. Church follows culture. Such a pattern of erasing history or revising it seems to be the mainstream. History reveals other times, places and purposes when history was erased or revised. I wonder what the real reasons are this time? It’s obvious to me. Anyone else? David Stevens says: Assistant/Associate Rector Morristown, NJ Missioner for Disaster Resilience Sacramento, CA Joel Watson says: Featured Jobs & Callslast_img read more

read more